Accumulation of intracellular ascorbate from dehydroascorbic acid by astrocytes is decreased after oxidative stress and restored by propofol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary rat astrocyte cultures absorbed dehydroascorbic acid from the medium and reduced it to intracellular ascorbate. Uptake of dehydroascorbic acid (5-200 microM) was inhibited only partially by glucose (10 mM). The remaining glucose-insensitive component of dehydroascorbic acid uptake was inhibited reversibly by sulfinpyrazone (IC(50) = 80 microM). Dehydroascorbic acid uptake was not mediated by Na(+)-ascorbate cotransporters or volume-sensitive anion channels because it was neither Na(+)-dependent nor blocked by the channel antagonist, 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid. Oxidative stress, induced in astrocytes by the lipophilic radical generator tert-butyl hydroperoxide, decreased intracellular glutathione concentration and inhibited accumulation of intracellular ascorbate from dehydroascorbic acid. Subsequent administration of either the native antioxidant alpha-tocopherol (200 microM) or anesthetic concentrations of the antioxidant sedative propofol (1-8 microM, administered 30 min after tert-butyl hydroperoxide), did not change glutathione concentration but restored the ability of astrocytes to accumulate intracellular ascorbate from dehydroascorbic acid. These results are consistent with a novel mechanism of astrocytic ascorbate accumulation that is inhibited by lipophilic radicals and protected by lipophilic antioxidants such as propofol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".