Implications of host-guest interactions for tourists' travel behaviour and experiences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Implications of host-guest interactions for tourists' travel behaviour and experiencesTh rough their multiple roles in tourism, residents of destination communities interact with tourists at destinations.Th e consequences of these host-guest interactions are bi-directional.Much research has been done on impacts of host-guest interactions on the local community.On the other hand, few studies have evaluated how tourists' on-site behaviour and experiences are aff ected by such interactions.Such information could enhance tourism planning and management.Th us, this paper explores tourists' perceptions and opinions on host-guest interactions and the impacts of such interactions on their experiences.Th rough a survey of domestic travelers residing in Beijing China conducted in 2008, tourists' opinions on the infl uence of destination community members on their previous domestic travel behaviour and experiences were obtained.Most respondents acknowledged that interactions with local people infl uence their assessments of the destination, the quality of their experiences, future destination choice and on-site expenditures, particularly those with higher educations and of a younger age.Th e importance of impacts of host-guest interactions on tourists' travel behaviour and experiences, and their evaluations of a destination are confi rmed.Practical implications are suggested for the planning and management of tourism destinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".