Androgen Effects on Hippocampal CA1 Spine Synapse Numbers Are Retained in Tfm Male Rats with Defective Androgen Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of estradiol benzoate (EB), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), or the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide on CA1 pyramidal cell dendritic spine synapses were investigated in adult male rats. To elucidate the contribution of the androgen receptor to the hormone-induced increase in hippocampal CA1 synapses, wild-type males were compared with males expressing the Tfm mutation, which results in synthesis of defective androgen receptors. Orchidectomized rats were treated with EB (10 microg/rat.d), DHT (500 mug/rat.d), hydroxyflutamide (5 mg/rat.d), or the sesame oil vehicle sc daily for 2 d and examined using quantitative electron microscopic stereological techniques, 48 h after the second injection. In wild-type males, DHT and hydroxyflutamide both induced increases in the number of spine synapses in the CA1 stratum radiatum, whereas EB had no effect. DHT almost doubled the number of synaptic contacts observed, whereas hydroxyflutamide increased synapse density by approximately 50%, compared with the vehicle-injected controls. Surprisingly, in Tfm males, the effects of EB, DHT, and hydroxyflutamide were all indistinguishable from those observed in wild-type animals. These observations demonstrate that Tfm male rats resemble normal males in having no detectable hippocampal synaptic response to a dose of EB that is highly effective in females. Despite the reduction in androgen sensitivity as a result of the Tfm mutation, hippocampal synaptic responses to both DHT and a mixed androgen agonist/antagonist (hydroxyflutamide) remain intact in Tfm males. These data are consistent with previous results suggesting that androgen effects on hippocampal spine synapses may involve novel androgen response mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".