Risk Factors and Trends in Childhood Stunting in a District in Western Uganda
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This representative, cross-sectional study conducted in Kabarole District, Western Uganda, determined the nutritional status of children 6-59 months of age and established a trend in the childhood stunting rates. METHODS: A multi-stage random cluster sampling was performed to select 322 children and their principal caregivers. Anthropometric measurements were taken from the children and compared with a reference population and the children's principle caregivers were interviewed. RESULTS: Childhood stunting was high with 43.0% of all children having a z-score of less than or equal to -2. Predictive factors for stunting were a low economic status of the household, poor health of the child's caregiver, residence located at a long distance from a health unit and use of a contaminated water source. The comparison of our study results with an earlier nutritional study in Kabarole District revealed that there is an increasing trend of childhood stunting over the years of 28.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1-33.1%] in 1989 vs 43% (95% CI 37.6-48.8%) in 2006 and that stunting rates in Kabarole District were much higher compared to national data. CONCLUSION: The high stunting rates in children and the increasing trend in stunting needs further investigations. It should also be determined why stunting rates in children in Kabarole District are much higher than the national average. There is a need for better nutritional interventions as part of the district's public health programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it