Relationship of insulin sensitivity to aerobic capacity in Standardbred mares and geldings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between insulin sensitivity and aerobic capacity and serum adipocytokine (leptin, adiponectin) concentrations in 14 mature, unconditioned Standardbred horses (eight mares, six geldings). Each horse underwent a euglycaemic–hyperinsulinaemic clamp (EHC) and a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) for assessment of insulin sensitivity. Aerobic capacity was determined by measurement of the peak rate of oxygen uptake (V˙O 2peak ) during an incremental exercise test (IET). Serum leptin and adiponectin concentrations were measured in baseline samples obtained before tests of insulin sensitivity. Mean body weight, condition score, V˙O 2peak and run time during the IET did not differ between the sex groups. However, minimal model analysis of the FSIGT showed that insulin sensitivity (S I , ×10 −4 l mU −1 min −1 ) was higher ( P = 0.002) in geldings (4.21±0.78) than in mares (2.43±0.95), while the acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg) and glucose utilization independent of insulin (S G ) were significantly higher in mares. Similarly, glucose uptake (M) per unit of serum insulin (I) during the EHC (M/I ratio) tended ( P = 0.08) to be higher in geldings than in mares (×10 −2 mg kg −1 min −1 per μU ml −1 : 2.41±0.64 vs. 1.80±0.51). There was no significant relationship between V˙O 2peak and measures of insulin sensitivity. Stepwise multiple linear regression modelling determined that sex (65%) and leptin concentrations (13.7%) accounted for 78.7% of the variance in S I , while 46% of the variance in M/I could be attributed to sex. It was concluded that aerobic capacity is not an important determinant of insulin-mediated glucose disposal in mature, untrained Standardbred horses. Further studies are needed to examine the influence of gender on insulin sensitivity in horses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".