MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133389824 · doi:10.3402/mehd.v15i2-3.7968

Expression of GroEL and DnaK Proteins during the Acquisition of a Transitory Resistance to Lethal Stresses by<i>Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans</i>

2003· article· en· W2133389824 on OpenAlexaff
Florence Goulhen, Daniel Grenier, D. Mayrand

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobial Ecology in Health and Disease · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroELActinobacillusMicrobiologyResistance (ecology)BiologyBacteriaGeneticsEscherichia coliEcologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans is a periodontopathogenic bacterium associated with active lesions of localized aggressive periodontitis. Cells of A. actinomycetemcomitans grown to mid-log phase, diluted or undiluted, and subjected to a sublethal heat stress demonstrated a partial protection to a subsequent lethal heat stress. On the contrary, stationary phase heat-stressed cells did not exhibit this transient thermal protection. Heat-stressed cells at sublethal temperature showed a higher expression of GroEL and DnaK proteins by immunoblotting, which was in agreement with de novo synthesis. A. actinomycetemcomitans was found to be more sensitive to a pH than to a heat stress. A transient protection to a lethal acid stress was demonstrated when cells were previously subjected to a sublethal acid stress. On the contrary, such transient protection did not occur for alkaline stresses. DnaK but not GroEL proteins made up a high proportion of the total protein synthesized following acid stress. The protection phenomenon is highly complex and heat shock proteins, which may help A. actinomycetemcomitans to support subsequent lethal conditions, are not expressed in the same way during the different stresses investigated. Key words: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans , periodontitis, heat shock protein, stress tolerance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobial Ecology in Health and DiseaseSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207