MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133390787 · doi:10.1038/oby.2005.120

Regulation of Global Gene Expression by Ovariectomy and Estrogen in Female Adipose Tissue

2005· article· en· W2133390787 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Ye, Mayumi Yoshioka, Lin Gan, Jonny St‐Amand

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdipose tissueEstrogenEndocrinologyInternal medicineGene expressionMedicineEstrogen replacement therapyGeneBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of ovariectomy (OVX) and estrogen replacement on global gene expression in white adipose tissue. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Female mice were randomly divided into four groups: 1) intact, 2) OVX, 3) OVX plus estradiol (E2) injection 3 hours before death (E(2)-3 hours), and 4) E(2)-24 hours. The serial analysis of gene expression was performed to detect the transcriptomic changes. RESULTS: A total of 15 transcripts, including several novel transcripts, were found to be modulated by OVX or E2 (p<0.05). Secreted acidic cysteine-rich glycoprotein, which regulates the extracellular matrix (ECM) components, was increased after OVX. Moreover, OVX up-regulated several transcripts involved in ECM, such as procollagen types Ialpha1 and 2. In cell defense, glutathione peroxidase 3 was lower in OVX than in intact mice. Cytochrome c oxidase I and three novel transcripts were up-regulated by estrogen treatment. DISCUSSION: This study underlines the importance of cell shape and ECM regulation by OVX on adiposity. Moreover, some novel transcripts may also play a relevant role in OVX-induced obesity and estrogen therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity ResearchSame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207