MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Precise ID-TIMS U–Pb baddeleyite ages (1110–1112Ma) for the Rincón del Tigre–Huanchaca large igneous province (LIP) of the Amazonian Craton: Implications for the Rodinia supercontinent

2014· article· en· W2133449681 on OpenAlexaff
Wilson Teixeira, Mike A. Hamilton, Gabrielle Aparecida de Lima, Amarildo Salina Ruiz, Ramiro Matos, Richard E. Ernst

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecambrian Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRodiniaCratonLaurentiaSupercontinentGeologyLarge igneous provincePrecambrianAmazonianBaddeleyiteIntraplate earthquakeGeochemistryBalticaMaficMagmatismMantle plumeZirconPaleontologyPaleozoicLithosphereAmazon rainforestOrdovicianTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High quality U–Pb (ID-TIMS) baddeleyite ages define the timing of crystallization of the Rincón del Tigre layered intrusion (1110 ± 2 Ma) and the Huanchaca mafic suite (1112 ± 2 Ma) in the Bolivian Precambrian shield – SW portion of the Amazonian Craton. The identical ca. 1110–1112 Ma ages obtained for each (about 500 km apart) suggest these belong to a previously unrecognized LIP . The large area of distribution and the intraplate geochemistry for the 1110 Ma Huanchaca–Rincón del Tigre rocks support a relationship with mantle plume activity pre-dating Rodinia breakup. Contemporary anorogenic magmatism in Amazonia is probably linked to crustal melting caused by the LIP . The newly identified 1110 Ma LIP has a tight age match with intraplate magmatism in the Congo, Kalahari and Indian cratons, and the Keweenawan event of central Laurentia among others. While a reconstruction history of Amazonia and Laurentia is still a matter of debate on paleomagnetic grounds, a reconstruction link with other crustal blocks remains possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrecambrian ResearchSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207