MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133460611 · doi:10.1159/000112950

Possible Relationship between the COMT Gene Vel<sup>158</sup>Met Polymorphism and Psychometric IQ in Girls of the Qinba Region in China

2007· article· en· W2133460611 on OpenAlexaff
Kejin Zhang, Zijian Zheng, Xiaocai Gao, Jing Li, Fuchang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychobiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Abilities and Testing
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPolymorphism (computer science)GeneticsGeneGenotypeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene was hypothesized to have a relationship with human prefrontal cortex (PFC) function and individual cognitive abilities. The object of this study was to investigate the possible impact of genotypes of COMT Val158Met polymorphism on cognitive ability among children living in the Qinba region in China. METHOD: A total of 305 children were included, 163 girls and 142 boys; both complete IQ evaluation and Val158Met genotyping results were obtained. The quantitative traits of psychometric IQ were calculated by using the Chinese Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. All subjects' genotypes of COMT gene Val158Met polymorphism were identified with the restriction fragment length polymorphism method. RESULTS: The F test showed that the average scores (including the Full Scale IQ, Verbal Scale IQ, Performance Scale IQ and three index scores) did not significantly differ among different groups defined by Val158Met genotypes, neither in boys nor in the total group (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the average of Freedom from Distractibility score among different genotypes found in girls (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that COMT gene Val158Met polymorphism may be related to the intelligence of Chinese girls, although the results cannot withstand multiple testing. Consequently, further studies with larger samples and perfect design still need place more emphasis on the gender difference and compensation effect of dopamine activity in PFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychobiologySame topicCognitive Abilities and TestingFrench-language works237,207