MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133480404 · doi:10.1139/x06-069

Multicentury history of western spruce budworm outbreaks in interior Douglas-fir forests near Kamloops, British Columbia

2006· article· en· W2133480404 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Rochelle Campbell, Dan J. Smith, André Arsenault

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpruce budwormDouglas firOutbreakForestryGeographyPinus <genus>Choristoneura fumiferanaDendrochronologyEcologyTortricidaeBiologyLepidoptera genitaliaArchaeologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman) is a native defoliator of forests in the interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco) forests of British Columbia, Canada. Dendrochronological techniques and the software program OUTBREAK were used to reconstruct a defoliation history of Douglas-fir for 19 forest sites near Kamloops in central British Columbia. By comparing the radial-growth response of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex P. Laws. & C. Laws.) with that of Douglas-fir growing in nearby but separate stands, eight western spruce budworm outbreaks over the past 300 years were distinguished. Although there is considerable variation in the timing and duration of these western spruce budworm events at the stand level, synchronous outbreaks have occurred in approximately 30- to 43-year cycles. Spectral analyses of a composite time series from all stands showed similar and consistent intervals between outbreaks. Climatic variation appears to have been important to budworm outbreaks in the 20th century. Notable outbreaks tended to occur during years with average spring air temperatures following winters with less than average precipitation. Based on this finding, it is proposed that with high over-winter survival rates and a longer growing season, the duration of outbreaks may increase in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207