A Novel Method of Estimation of DPOAE Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new method of measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) signal level based on a recently introduced nonlinear adaptive method of extraction of nonstationary sinusoids is presented. Essentially, three units of such an algorithm are employed to extract and measure the two stimuli and the DPOAE signal. Each unit has the capability of locking on a specified sinusoidal component of the input signal and tracking its variations over time. Performance of the proposed method is demonstrated with the aid of computer simulations and is verified in laboratory using recorded clinical data. Comparison is made between the proposed technique and existing methods. The proposed method features structural simplicity which renders it particularly attractive for implementation on both software and hardware platforms. It offers a high degree of immunity with regard to background noise and parameter variations. Compared to conventional methods, the proposed method offers a shorter measurement time which is of significant value in clinical examinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it