MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133638816 · doi:10.1002/sia.2075

XPS studies of octadecylphosphonic acid (OPA) monolayer interactions with some metal and mineral surfaces

2005· article· en· W2133638816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinding energyMonolayerX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCopperMetalChemistrySubstrate (aquarium)SiliconAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MuscoviteInorganic chemistryCrystallographyMaterials scienceChemical engineeringMetallurgyAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Partial and complete self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) of octadecylphosphonic acid (OPA) have been deposited onto air‐exposed surfaces of the metals copper, silver, gold, iron, silicon and aluminium, as well as onto freshly cleaved, air‐exposed surfaces of the minerals muscovite and biotite. The line width of the C(1s) signal in the XPS spectra of the surface narrowed, as the extent of coverage increased to 100%, to a half‐width of 0.9 eV. Moreover, the line widths associated with the insulating muscovite substrate also became substantially narrower as OPA coverage increased. Binding energy differences on this charge‐shifted surface were found to be more consistent when OPA was used as a charge reference, compared to using adventitious carbon as a reference. OPA coverage of the air‐exposed metals copper, silver, gold and iron also produced narrow C(1s) spectra whose binding energies were consistently close to 284.9 eV. The C(1s) binding energy positions on Al and Si samples were charge‐shifted by the insulating nature of the thin oxide formed on air exposure, or by the insulating nature of the substrate in the case of the minerals. Correction of the observed C(1s) energy position to 284.9 eV gave sets of elemental binding energies for the substrate materials that were reproducible. Thus, OPA coverage could be a possible alternative candidate for use in charge correction of binding energies of insulating materials. The OPA coverage cases were modelled using the software QUASES ™ Analyse. For the substrates copper, silver, gold, iron and aluminium, analyses of the metal core line spectra gave OPA overlayer thicknesses close to those measured by AFM (1.6 nm). However, QUASES ™ analyses of the C(1s) extrinsic backgrounds for the same surfaces required the use of an attenuation length of only 0.4 nm to derive a comparable thickness—much lower than literature values for carbon. This discrepancy is ascribed to the structured nature of the SAM. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it