Treprostinil Sodium (Remodulin), a Prostacyclin Analog, in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia: Open-Label Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of continuous subcutaneous therapy with treprostinil sodium (Remodulin), a prostacyclin analog, and its effect on ischemic rest pain and ischemic wound healing in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and no planned revascularization procedure. This was a 12-week, open-label, single-center pilot study enrolling 10 subjects (mean age 82.4 years) with Fontaine stage III to IV (Rutherford class 4-6) peripheral arterial disease and ankle brachial indices less than 0.55. The primary end point was safety, and the secondary end points were the effects of treatment on ischemic rest pain, limb salvage, and wound healing. There was a 62% reduction in mean worst rest pain and a 57% reduction in mean average rest pain at week 12, with most subjects using less pain medication. Three subjects experienced complete healing of their wounds. No subject developed a new wound during the trial. Treprostinil was generally well tolerated. Subcutaneous infusion-site pain was the most frequently reported side effect, with one subject withdrawing from the study as a result. Jaw pain was reported by two subjects. One subject experienced two serious adverse events considered unrelated to treprostinil (cholecystitis and congestive heart failure). This study demonstrates that chronic, continuous subcutaneous treprostinil is safe and can be useful in the treatment of ischemic pain and wounds in subjects with CLI. Future controlled studies are needed to evaluate these effects and determine appropriate patient selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it