MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133710538 · doi:10.1144/pygs.53.2.119

Lower Carboniferous sponges from the Craven Reef Belt of North Yorkshire

2000· article· en· W2133710538 on OpenAlexaff
Jane R. Rigby, D. J. C. Mundy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboniferousReefGeologyArchaeologyGeographyPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Fossil sponges are significant elements in framework facies of Late Visean Cracoean reefs of northern England. In the Craven Reef Belt (North Yorkshire), lithistid demosponges, including Scheiia castletonense (Wolfenden 1959), Haplistion carbonaria (Wolfenden 1959) and Haplistion mega sp. nov., occur along with the less abundant, sphinctozoid demosponge Sollasia ramosa sp. nov. in this facies. Scheiia castletonense is an irregular globose to mound-shaped tricranocladinid hindiid sponge with irregular secondary branchlike growths in which the canal and skeletal structure are continuous with those of the globular part of the sponge. Both species of Haplistion are rhizomorinid lithistid sponges. Haplistion mega is a lobate sponge characterized by moderately coarse skeletal tracts that are relatively far apart, in contrast to the fine tracts and closer spacing in the more common globose to subspherical Haplistion carbonaria . The aporate ‘sphinctozoan’ Sollasia ramosa, commonly appears in the available sections as isolated spherical chambers because of its relatively loose branching habit and the beadlike to moniliform series of spherical chambers in each branch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological SocietySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207