Polyethylene Glycol-Modified GM-CSF Expands CD11bhighCD11chigh But Not CD11blowCD11chigh Murine Dendritic Cells In Vivo: A Comparative Analysis with Flt3 Ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DC) are potent APCs that can be characterized in the murine spleen as CD11b(high)CD11c(high) or CD11b(low)CD11c(high). Daily injection of mice of Flt3 ligand (FL) into mice transiently expands both subsets of DC in vivo, but the effect of administration of GM-CSF on the expansion of DC in vivo is not well defined. To gain further insight into the role of GM-CSF in DC development and function in vivo, we treated mice with polyethylene glycol-modified GM-CSF (pGM-CSF) which has an increased half-life in vivo. Administration of pGM-CSF to mice for 5 days led to a 5- to 10-fold expansion of CD11b(high)CD11c(high) but not CD11b(low)CD11c(high) DC. DC from pGM-CSF-treated mice captured and processed Ag more efficiently than DC from FL-treated mice. Although both FL- and pGM-CSF-generated CD11b(high)CD11c(high) DC were CD8alpha-, a greater proportion of these DC from pGM-CSF-treated mice were 33D1+ than from FL-treated mice. CD11b(low)CD11c(high) DC from FL-treated mice expressed high levels of intracellular MHC class II. DC from both pGM-CSF- and FL-treated mice expressed high levels of surface class II, low levels of the costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86 and were equally efficient at stimulating allogeneic and Ag-specific T cell proliferation in vitro. The data demonstrate that treatment with pGM-CSF in vivo preferentially expands CD11b(high)CD11c(high) DC that share phenotypic and functional characteristics with FL-generated CD11b(high)CD11c(high) DC but can be distinguished from FL-generated DC on the basis of Ag capture and surface expression of 33D1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".