Targeted Inactivation of EGF Receptor Inhibits Renal Collecting Duct Development and Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ureteric bud (UB) expresses high levels of the EGF receptor (EGFR) during kidney development, but its function in this setting is unclear. Here, Egfr mRNA was abundant in medullary portions of the UB trunk but absent from the branching UB tips during embryogenesis. Homozygous Egfr knockout did not affect the pattern of UB arborization, but renal papillae were hypoplastic and exhibited widespread apoptosis of tubular cells. Because these EGFR-deficient mice die within 1 week of life, we targeted Egfr inactivation to the renal collecting ducts using Cre-lox technology with a Hoxb7-Cre transgene. This targeted inactivation of Egfr led to a thin renal medulla, and at 7 weeks of age, the mice had moderate polyuria and reduced urine-concentrating ability. At 30 to 33 weeks, water deprivation demonstrated a continued urine-concentrating defect despite similar levels of vasopressin between knockout mice and littermate controls. Taken together, these results suggest that unlike other tyrosine kinases expressed at the UB tip, EGFR functions primarily to drive elongation of the emerging collecting ducts and to optimize urine-concentrating ability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".