Synthesis, X-ray characterization and study of new ionic complexes of 2-pyridone, obtained by oxidation with I2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of 2-pyridone (C5H5NO or PYOH) with diiodine in molar ratios of 2∶1 and 1∶2 resulted in the formation of complexes {[(PYOH)3(PYOH)+]·I3−} (1) and {{(PYOH)6·[(PYOH)2]2+}·0.5I−·1.5I7−·I2} (2), respectively. The reactions were carried out in dichloromethane solutions in air. The compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, DTA-TGA chromatography, FT-Raman, FT-IR, UV-vis and EPR spectroscopies. Crystal structures of the named complexes have been determined by X-ray diffraction at 120(1) K (1) and 293(2) K (2). Compound 1, [(C20H20N4O4)I3], monoclinic, space group C2/c, consists of a cationic PYOH+ radical species and an I3− counter anion; three neutral PYOH molecules are also bound to the complex. The crystal structure of [(C40H40N8O8)I13] (2) reveals a centrosymmetric P-1 triclinic space group containing two cationic PYOH+ species, with the anionic counterparts being one half I− and three halves I7−. Also, a neutral diiodine molecule I2 is retained by weak halogen-halogen interactions to I−, as well as six neutral PYOH ligands. The structures of 1 and 2 consist of hydrogen-bonded pyridine layers; polyiodide fragments fill the spaces between the layers, additionally kept together by a number of weak C–H⋯I interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".