MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133890671 · doi:10.2216/i0031-8884-41-1-61.1

Nuclear rDNA sequences from<i>Ballia prieurii</i>support recognition of<i>Balliopsis</i>gen. nov. in the Batrachospermales (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta)

2002· article· en· W2133890671 on OpenAlexaff
Gary W. Saunders, Orlando Necchi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhycologia · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyIncertae sedisGenusAsexual reproductionMarine speciesBotanyZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear small-subunit and partial large-subunit rDNA sequences were determined for the freshwater rhodophyte species Ballia prieurii, from northern Brazil, to assess its relationship to the marine species that have recently been transferred to a new order, Balliales, in the Florideophyceae. Ballia prieurii unequivocally associated with species of the freshwater order Batrachospermales, rather than with the marine Balliales, in all molecular analyses. In addition to habitat, asexual reproduction by monosporangia in the freshwater species of Ballia is consistent with inclusion in the Batrachospermales and has not been reported for any marine Ballia species, which reproduce exclusively by asexual tetrasporangia. As B. prieurii is distinct in morphological and molecular features from all other members of Batrachospermales, a new genus Balliopsis G.W. Saunders & Necchi gen. nov. is proposed to accommodate this species, which becomes Balliopsis prieurii (Kützing) G.W. Saunders & Necchi comb. nov. Previously published morphological and anatomical observations indicate that a second freshwater species of Ballia, B. pinnulata, is clearly related to Balliopsis prieurii and it too is transferred to the new genus. The familial affinities of Balliopsis are discussed, but Balliopsis is left as a genus Incertae sedis within the Batrachospermales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhycologiaSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207