MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133913941 · doi:10.1109/tra.2002.999645

SHaDe, a new 3-DOF haptic device

2002· article· en· W2133913941 on OpenAlexafffund
Lionel Birglen, Clément Gosselin, Nicolas Pouliot, Bruno Monsarrat, Thierry Laliberté

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsHaptic technologyTeleoperationComputer scienceKinematicsSimulationMechanism (biology)StereotaxyHuman–computer interactionControl engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new type of haptic device using spherical geometry. The basic idea of haptic devices is to provide users with feedback information on the motion and/or force that he or she generates. Haptic devices have several potential applications such as, for example, fine compliant assembly, VR environment simulation, and high-precision teleoperation, especially in hazardous or hostile areas. The particular architecture of the spherical haptic device developed here will be presented and its advantages will be highlighted. Then, its basic kinematic properties, which shall be used for control and geometric optimization purposes, will be reviewed. The design optimization itself will then highlight some important features of the mechanism. The control scheme and real-time force feedback issues will then be presented. Finally, the results obtained with the prototype will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Robotics and AutomationSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207