Ammonia tolerance in the slender lungfish (<i>Protopterus dolloi</i>): the importance of environmental acidification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protopterus dolloi Boulenger, 1900 is an obligate air-breather and exhibits ammoniotely (88% ammonia-N excretion, 12% urea-N excretion) under normal aquatic conditions, but tolerates 7 days of exposure to 30 mmol·L1NH4Cl, a treatment fatal to most other fish. Internal N accumulation is minimal and the subsequent washout of ammonia-N and urea-N after return to control conditions is negligible, indicating that N excretion continues and (or) that N metabolism is markedly depressed. Exposure to 30 mmol·L1NH4Cl in a closed system without aeration results in depressed urea-N excretion. The lungfish greatly acidifies the external water, a volume 25-fold greater than its own volume. The extent of this acidification increases with time. After several days, the external pH falls from about 7.0 to below 5.0 over a 24-h period, thereby markedly reducing the concentration of NH3(the form that diffuses across biological membranes). CO2excretion is partially responsible for this acidification, because vigorous water aeration reduces but does not eliminate the acidification, and urea-N excretion increases moderately. However, a substantial excretion of titratable acid (non-CO2acidity) also occurs. One exceptional lungfish was able to maintain its aerated environment at a stable pH of 3.7. Environmental acidification may be a less costly strategy for avoiding toxicity than detoxifying ammonia by increasing urea production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".