MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Déterminants of In‐store Information Search Stratégies Pertaining to a Christmas Gift Purchase

2000· article· en· W2133966747 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michel Laroche, Gad Saad, Elizabeth Browne, Mark Cleveland, Chankon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituational ethicsClothingHumanitiesDimension (graph theory)AdvertisingPsychologyArtSocial psychologyBusinessPolitical scienceMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study examines consumers' use of in‐store information sources while Christmas shopping. A literature review identifies a number of situational, personal, and démographic variables that may influence search behaviour for a Christmas gift. A survey was conducted soon after the Christmas season to investigate the effects of the identified variables on search behaviour pertaining to a clothing gift. Findings indicate that in‐store search behaviour consists of three dimensions: general information search (e.g., dispays, comparing prices/brands), specific information search (e.g., labels, packaging), and assistance of sales clerks. Each search dimension was regressed on the identified variables, and determinants were obtained. Situational variables consistently outper‐forn all other variables, and personal variables outper‐form demographics for the two nonpersonal search variables. Implications for further research and for practitioners are provided. Résumé La présente recherche s'intéresse à l'utilisation par les consommateurs des sources d'information à l'intérieur du magasin lors du choix de cadeaux de Noël. Une revue de la littérature identifie plusieurs variables (personnalité, situation et démographie) comme pouvant influencer la recherche d'information lors du choix d'un cadeau de Noël. Une enquěte a été menée juste après les Fětes afin d'identifier les variables qui ont pu influencer le choix d'un větement comme cadeau. Les résultats indiquent que la recherche d'information comporte trois dimensions: la recherche générale (ex.: présentoirs, comparaison des marques et des prix), la recherche spécifique (ex.: étiquettes et emballage) et l'aide d'un vendeur. Une régression de toutes les variables sur chaque dimension permet d'identifier les déterminants de la recherche d'information. Les variables de situation sont les plus importantes sur les trois dimensions, et les variables de personnalité plus importantes que les variables démographiques sur les deux premières dimensions. Enfin, l'article fournit des suggestions pour de futures recherches et indique les retombées pour les gestionnaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l AdministrationSame topicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207