MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EFFECT OF BIOMECHANICAL CONDITIONING ON CARTILAGINOUS TISSUE FORMATION IN VITRO

2003· article· en· W2134025351 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen D. Waldman, Caroline G. Spiteri, Marc D. Grynpas, Robert M. Pilliar, Jason Hong, Rita A. Kandel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartilageExtracellular matrixBiomedical engineeringTissue engineeringIn vitroBiophysicsMatrix (chemical analysis)ChemistryMaterials scienceShear forceTissue cultureAnatomyIn vivoArticular cartilageComposite materialPathologyBiologyMedicineOsteoarthritisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although tissue engineering of articular cartilage is a promising approach for cartilage repair, it has been difficult to develop cartilaginous tissue in vitro that mimics the properties of native cartilage. Isolated chondrocytes grown in culture typically do not accumulate enough extracellular matrix, and the generated tissue possesses only a fraction of the mechanical properties of native cartilage. One potential explanation for this might be that the cells are grown in an environment that lacks the mechanical stimuli to which the chondrocytes are exposed in vivo. In this study, we compared the long-term effects of both dynamic compressive and shearing forces on cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. METHODS: Bovine articular chondrocytes were grown on the surface of porous ceramic substrates and were maintained under static, free-swelling conditions for a period of four weeks. Cultures were then subjected to six minutes of mechanical stimulation every other day, in either compression or shear, for an additional four-week period. RESULTS: Cartilaginous tissues cultured in the presence of intermittent compression or shear were significantly thicker (p < 0.05) and had accumulated more extracellular matrix (p < 0.01) compared with the unstimulated controls. However, when normalized by the wet weight of the tissue, cultures stimulated in the presence of shearing forces contained more proteoglycans and collagen compared with compression-stimulated cultures. These cultures also displayed the largest increase in mechanical properties, with a threefold increase in equilibrium stress and a fivefold increase in equilibrium modulus. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study demonstrate that a brief application of mechanical forces applied periodically over a long duration can improve the quality of cartilaginous tissue formed in vitro. However, the changes in tissue composition and mechanical properties were dependent on the specific mode of the applied mechanical forces, with shear stimulation eliciting the greater effect. This finding suggests that chondrocytes may respond differently to different modes of applied forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations166
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207