Lipid composition of malpigmented and normally pigmented newly settled yellowtail flounder,<i>Limanda ferruginea</i>(Storer)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lipid composition of malpigmented (MP) and normally pigmented (NP), newly settled yellowtail flounder (Limanda ferruginea, Storer) was compared in order to elucidate a possible connection between lipids and pigmentation development. Larvae were fed commercially enriched live food for 12 weeks post hatch and then differences in lipid composition and size were analysed. NP fish were found to be significantly larger (standard length 35 mm) than MP fish (32 mm) at 100% settlement. There were higher proportions of triacylglycerols in NP fish (P = 0.01), whereas MP fish had an increased percentage of phospholipids (P = 0.01). NP fish had a higher percentage of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the polar lipids of their body (P = 0.03) and total lipids of their eyes (P = 0.04). These data support previously proposed theories for the importance of DHA in pigmentation development. Principal components analysis (PCA) described the majority of the variance (77%) within the data set using just two principal components axes. PCA demonstrated that differences between body zones were greater than those between NP and MP fish within a given zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it