MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134049821 · doi:10.1086/420787

Genomic Polymorphism of Human Papillomavirus Type 52 Predisposes toward Persistent Infection in Sexually Active Women

2004· article· en· W2134049821 on OpenAlexaff
Joséphine Aho, Catherine Hankins, Cécile Tremblay, Pierre Forest, Karina Pourreaux, Fabrice Douglas Rouah, François Coutlée

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioHPV infectionConfidence intervalPolymerase chain reactionUnivariate analysisHuman papillomavirusBiologyGenotypeVirologyMedicineCervical cancerInternal medicineGeneMultivariate analysisGeneticsCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 52 polymorphism in the persistence of HPV infection, which is a predictor for cervical lesions. Cervical samples obtained at 6-month intervals were tested for HPV-52 in 1055 women; 41, 12, and 58 women had persistent, transient, and unclassified HPV-52 infections, respectively. HPV-52 isolates were analyzed by polymerase chain-reaction sequencing of the long control region (LCR), E6, and E7 genes. Although age (odds ratio [OR], 0.90 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.99]), nonprototypic LCR (OR, 9.26 [95% CI, 2.1-41.7]), and E6 variant (OR, 7.04 [95% CI, 1.4-37]) were associated, in univariate analysis, with the persistence of HPV-52 infection, a nonprototypic LCR variant was the only independent predictor of it (OR, 14.1 [95% CI, 1.1-200]). In the latter variants, the loss of a binding site for a repressor of HPV expression was associated with the persistence of HPV infection (OR, 7.25 [95% CI, 1.67-31.25]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207