THE IMPACT OF CONCUSSION ON CARDIAC AUTONOMIC FUNCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EVIDENCE FOR RECOVERY AND PREVENTION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Concussions can negatively impact cognitive, behavioural, and physiological function. The current standard of care does not account for the physiological impact of concussion. Cardiac autonomic function (CAF) is responsive to changes in physical and cognitive exertion in healthy populations. The influence of concussion on CAF is not well understood. Objective To evaluate the evidence regarding the effect of concussion on cardiac autonomic function. Design Systematic Review. Setting Databases [Medline, SportDiscus, HealthSTAR, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed and ProQuest, Web of Science and Google Scholar] were systematically searched using keywords and MeSH terms. Sample Inclusion criteria: original research, available in English, included participants with concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and had a comparison group. Studies of humans (greater than 6 years old) and animals were included. Ten articles were identified for critical appraisal (six cohort studies, four cross-sectional). Independent variable Diagnosis of a concussion or mTBI. Main outcome measurements Heart rate (HR) and/or heart rate variability (HRV). Critical appraisal was conducted using the Downs and Black criteria. Results There is conflicting evidence regarding CAF at rest following concussion/mTBI. There is evidence of elevated HR and reduced HRV with low intensity, steady-state exercise up to 10 days following concussion. No significant difference in HRV was found during isometric handgrip testing following concussion. The validity of current literature is limited by small sample sizes, lack of female or pediatric participants, varying methodologies and lack of follow-up. No studies evaluating CAF during cognitive exertion following concussion were found. Conclusions There is evidence to suggest that CAF is altered during physical activity following concussion. The limitations in available literature highlight the need further research. Understanding the effect of concussion on CAF will contribute to the development of more comprehensive concussion management and prevention strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".