MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134215283 · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr307

Epigenetic Alterations in Sperm DNA Associated with Testicular Cancer Treatment

2011· article· en· W2134215283 on OpenAlexafffund
Donovan Chan, Géraldine Delbès, Mylène Landry, Bernard Robaire, Jacquetta M. Trasler

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicological Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDe La Salle University
KeywordsBiologyDNA methylationTesticular cancerEpigeneticsGerm cellMethylationSpermEpigenomeMale infertilitySpermatidGerm cell tumorsSpermatogenesisCancerBleomycinAndrologyGeneticsCancer researchInfertilityGeneChemotherapyEndocrinologyGene expressionPregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA methylation, a key component of the epigenome involved in regulating gene expression, is initially acquired in the germ line at millions of sites across the genome. Altered sperm methylation patterns are associated with infertility and transgenerational effects in humans and rodents. Testicular cancer is the most common form of cancer among men of reproductive age and has a high cure rate associated with chemotherapy treatment with bleomycin, etoposide, and cis-platinum (BEP). Although these drugs result in improved survival, they also affect the number and quality of germ cells. Our goal was to assess germ cell methylation patterns in a rodent model emulating the BEP treatment regimens used in human testicular cancer treatment. Animals were treated with control, or 0.3× (low) or 0.6× (high) dose of BEP, where a 1× dose is equivalent to human treatment regimens. Both dose-dependent and germ cell-dependent DNA methylation alterations were found at numerous loci throughout the genome. Of about 3000 loci tested, 42 loci were affected by BEP at the round spermatid stage of germ cell development, whereas 101 loci were affected in spermatozoa; 15 loci were consistently altered in spermatozoa of all high dose-treated rats. Both hyper- and hypomethylation were detected, suggesting either an interference with normal methylation patterning or abnormal repair of damaged patterns during spermatogenesis. The results indicate that a combination chemotherapy regimen used for testicular cancer treatment can result in altered DNA methylation patterns in spermatozoa and that some loci are more susceptible to damage than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicological SciencesSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207