MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134261953 · doi:10.14740/jnr.v4i5-6.319

Key Role of Promoter Methylation and Inactivation of MCPH1 Gene in Brain Tumors

2014· article· en· W2134261953 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatemeh Karami, Firoozeh Javan, Masoud Mehrazin, Parvin Mehdipour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylationMolecular biologyBrain tumorDNA methylationBisulfite sequencingGenePromoterCancer researchTelomeraseBiologyMedicineGene expressionPathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Microcephalin (MCPH1/BIRT1) is a putative tumor suppressor gene which has recently seized great attentions in cancer studies. The present study was conducted to seek the impact of MCPH1 promoter methylation on development of brain tumors and telomere repeat length (TRL). Methods: The brain tissue section provided from brain tumor patients and two normal brain autopsies were undergone DNA isolation. DNA samples treated with bisulfite sodium using DNA modification kit (Qiagen) were amplified in methylation specific polymerization chain reaction (MSP-PCR) confirmed by sequencing. Protein expression analysis was performed by immunofluorescence (IF) assay using antibodies against MCPH1, cyclin E and CDC25A proteins. The TRL of brain tumor patients was determined through quantitative fluorescent in situ hybridization (Q-FISH). Results: The MCPH1 gene promoter was methylated in 96.6% of the patients consistent with protein expression pattern and the telomere statue was confirmed by low or absence of signal in tumor cells. Conclusion: MCPH1 promoter methylation had strong association with TRL, tumor’s grade and stage (P < 0.05). TRL was meaningfully associated with grade and subtype pathology of brain tumors (P = 0.01). Further studies are required to clarify the exact role of MCPH1 gene on TRL and tumor suppression especially in brain tumors. J Neurol Res. 2014;4(5-6):133-138 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jnr295e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207