Cytotoxic Mannich Bases of 1-Arylidene-2-tetralones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various 1-arylidene-2-tetralones 1 had been shown previously to possess moderate cytotoxic properties unaccompanied by murine toxicity. The objective of the present investigation was to undertake different molecular modifications of representative members of series 1 with a view to discerning those structural features leading to increased potencies. All compounds were evaluated using human Molt 4/C8 and CEM T-lymphocytes as well as murine P388 and L1210 leukemic cells. The Mannich bases 2, 4, 5 and 7 possessed increased potencies compared to the corresponding unsaturated ketones 1 and in general were potent cytotoxics having IC50 values in the 0.2-10 microM range. QSAR using the cytotoxicity data for 2a-e suggested that potency was positively correlated with the size of the substituents in the arylidene aryl ring. Compounds 2a-f were evaluated using a panel of approximately 53 human tumour cell lines and, when all cell lines were considered, were more potent than the reference drug melphalan. In particular, marked antileukemic activity was displayed. Molecular modeling was utilized in order to evaluate whether the shapes of the different compounds contributed to the varying potencies observed. Representative compounds demonstrated minimal or no inhibiting properties towards human N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) and did not bind to calf thymus DNA. This study has revealed a number of unique lead molecules as candidate anti-neoplastic agents serving as prototypes for future development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".