MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134279044 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.6.1329

THE WORLD-CLASS Sn, Nb, Ta, F (Y, REE, Li) DEPOSIT AND THE MASSIVE CRYOLITE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ALBITE-ENRICHED FACIES OF THE MADEIRA A-TYPE GRANITE, PITINGA MINING DISTRICT, AMAZONAS STATE, BRAZIL

2009· article· en· W2134279044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryAlbiteFaciesPetrologyGeomorphologyQuartzPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Madeira deposit, in the Pitinga mining district, Amazonas State, Brazil, is associated with the A-type Madeira granite (~1820 Ma), which is hosted by A-type volcanic rocks (Iricoume Group, ~1880 Ma) formed in a caldera complex. The deposit is characterized by an association of Sn with cryolite, Nb, Ta (Y, REE, Li, Zr, U, and Th) in the same albite-enriched granite that hosts a massive cryolite deposit. At the magmatic stage, the high F content in the melt was buffered by crystallization of cryolite. Tin (cassiterite) and Nb (uranoan plumbopyrochlore) were homogeneously dispersed throughout the deposit, transported by F-bearing complexes in the melt. Zircon crystallization, inhibited at the early magmatic stage by high-F activity, intensified at the late magmatic stage owing to a decrease in alkalinity associated to riebeckite crystallization, forming concentrations, together with xenotime and polythionite, in pegmatitic zones. Yttrium and REE mineralization in the lower portion of the deposit is represented by gagarinite-(Y), with fluocerite-(Ce) inclusions formed by exsolution of the early gagarinite. There is no evidence for silicate–fluoride liquid immiscibility, nor for a continuous transition from volatile-rich silicate melt to solute-rich fluids. The abrupt magmatic–hydrothermal transition triggered three processes: (1) albitization accompanied by the crystallization of hydrothermal cryolite in the rock matrix, (2) conversion of pyrochlore to a columbite-group mineral, characterized by gradual loss of Pb and enrichment in U and Nb, and (3) formation of the massive cryolite deposit, made up of crystals of twinned cryolite (87%) plus quartz, feldspar, and zircon from an aqueous saline (1.7 to 22.4 wt% equiv. NaCl) hydrothermal fluid, starting at a minimum temperature of 400°C and continuing down-temperature. The evolution of parameters (REEtotal, La/Lu, LREE/HREE, Y) in cryolite is continuous from the magmatic stage until the low-temperature hydrothermal stage. The models of mineralization invoked for Ivigtut, in Greenland, are not considered applicable. The evolution of the A-type magmatism at Pitinga is briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it