MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134405959 · doi:10.1002/aqc.1241

Changes in the diet of a recovering Eurasian otter population between the 1970s and 2010

2012· article· en· W2134405959 on OpenAlexaff
David Almeida, Gordon H. Copp, Laurence Masson, Rafael Miranda, Mizuki Murai, Carl D. Sayer

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOtterLutraPikeFisheryEsoxCrayfishRutilusBiologyPopulationPerchSticklebackEcologyGraylingHabitatPredationFish migrationApex predatorFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Diet is an essential element for understanding how the Eurasian otter ( Lutra lutra ) is re‐colonizing its former range in England following a population decline observed in the 1950s to 1970s. Otter spraints from the River Glaven catchment (north Norfolk, eastern England) were collected seasonally between 2009 and 2010 from three habitat types (ponds, ‘retenus’ (small in‐stream reservoirs), and stream stretches). Feeding tactics of the otter were compared between habitat types and, using previously published data, with regard to seasonal changes since the 1970s when the species was in decline. Otter diet composition varied greatly, with predation on aquatic invertebrates, crayfish, fish, and tetrapods. Fruit seeds were also found in the spraints. Diet generally reflected habitat, with northern pike ( Esox lucius ) remains found in spraints from ponds and retenus, whereas European eel ( Anguilla anguilla ) and gudgeon ( Gobio gobio ) were prominent in spraints from stream sections. Trophic diversity was particularly high in spraints collected next to ponds. Between the 1970s and the present, crayfish, brown trout ( Salmo trutta ), cyprinids, Eurasian perch ( Perca fluviatilis ), birds and mammals increased in prominence, whereas eel and threespine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ) decreased, with notable seasonal variations between the study periods. Otter spraints revealed few prey preferences, with only that for gudgeon being ecologically relevant. The consumption of popular sport fishes, in particular common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ), has given rise to conflicts between recreational anglers and otter conservationists, but no demonstrated preference for carp was observed in the present study. Overall, otters have increased their consumption of ‘less preferred’ (i.e. lower energetic value) food types, and because the species normally preys on the most abundant species available, this suggests declines in ‘preferred’ prey types. These dietary shifts could contribute to otter dispersal and re‐colonization of parts of its original European range where food availability may be higher. © 2012 Crown copyright.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207