Effects of a geometrical surface disturbance on flow past a circular cylinder: a large-scale spanwise wire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flow control induced by a single wire that is attached on the outer surface and parallel to the span of a stationary circular cylinder is investigated experimentally. The Reynolds number has a value of 10 000 and the wire diameter is nearly two orders of magnitude smaller than the cylinder diameter, while being larger than the thickness of the unperturbed boundary layer forming around the cylinder. A technique of high-image-density particle image velocimetry is used to characterize mean and unsteady structures of the separating shear layer and the near wake. Only one of the shear layers is directly perturbed by the surface wire. This disturbance, however, has important global consequences over the entire near wake, provided that the wire is located within a certain range of angular positions with respect to the approach flow. Over this range, there are two angles that can be defined as critical on the basis of the streamwise extent of the near-wake structure. In a simplified sense, these critical angles are associated with significant extension and contraction of the near wake, relative to the wake in the absence of the effect of a surface disturbance. The critical angle of the wire that yields the most significant extension of the near wake is also found to lead to bistable oscillations of the separating shear layer at irregular time intervals, much longer than the time scale associated with the classical Kármán vortex shedding. The foregoing two critical states of extension and contraction of the near wake are, respectively, linked to attenuation or enhancement of the Kármán instability. Moreover, the onset of the shear-layer instability, Reynolds stress, Strouhal number and the transverse extent of shear-layer flapping are all shown to depend on the angular position of the wire within the defined range of angles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".