Role of Stem B, Loop B, and Nucleotides next to the Primer Binding Site and the Kissing-Loop Domain in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication and Genomic-RNA Dimerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stem-loop B is a 12-nucleotide [nt]-long completely conserved sequence postulated to form a 4-bp stem and a 4-nt internal loop under the kissing-loop hairpin (klh) (nt 248 to 270) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genomic RNA. We investigated its role in viral replication, genomic RNA dimerization, and dimerization of partial HIV-1 RNA transcripts. The putative CUCG246-CGAG277 duplex was replaced by nine alternative complementary sequences, five likely to base pair only in short RNAs and four likely to base pair in long (approximately 500-nt) RNAs, as assessed by the algorithm mfold. Among the five former sequences, none preserved genome dimerization and all reduced viral replication by 98 to 99.9%. Among the four latter sequences, three (MB6, -9, and -10) preserved genome dimerization, one (MB7) did not significantly inhibit it, and two (MB9 and -10) preserved viral replication. We conclude that duplex formation by stem B nucleotides is necessary for viral infectivity and complete genome dimerization. Deleting the 5' or 3' side of loop B or of stem B had little impact on dimerization of partial RNA transcript and no impact on klh folding (and, for loop B mutations, on stem B folding), but each deletion inhibited genome dimerization almost as much as klh destruction. This suggests that loop B is required for complete genome dimerization and that loop B and stem B stimulate dimerization only in very long RNAs and/or in the presence of unidentified viral and cellular factors. Finally, we asked if nine deletions or nucleotide substitutions within nt 200 to 242 and/or nt 282 to 335 could influence genome dimerization. These mutations had intermediate inhibitory impacts consistent with their predicted influence on stem B, loop B, and klh formation. Two exceptions were Delta200-226 and Delta236-242 genomic RNAs, which dimerized relatively poorly despite having neutral or positive influences on stem B, loop B, and klh folding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".