MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134588886 · doi:10.2118/05-11-01

A New Technique to Measure the Breakthrough Capillary Pressure

2005· article· en· W2134588886 on OpenAlexafffund
Jonathan Smith, Ioannis Chatzis, Marios A. Ioannidis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDivision of Materials ResearchUniversity of Patras
KeywordsCapillary pressureCapillary actionWettingPressure sensorPorous mediumPressure measurementMaterials scienceSaturation (graph theory)Pressure dropPorosityChemistryComposite materialMechanicsChromatographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The breakthrough capillary pressure is an important macroscopic property of porous media that is used to predict permeability and to correlate capillary pressure curves. It is normally determined using the porous plate method, where the non-wetting phase is introduced into the medium in increasing steps of pressure until it establishes a continuous pathway through the sample. In mercury porosimetry, breakthrough capillary pressure is identified as the pressure corresponding to about 10 - 20% non-wetting phase saturation or the point of inflection in the drainage capillary pressure curve. A new method for measuring the breakthrough capillary pressure has been developed, involving a constant rate injection process as opposed to constant injection pressure. The scope of this paper is to report the accuracy and reliability of the new technique in measuring the breakthrough capillary pressure by reporting test results on transparent micromodels and Berea sandstone core samples. Air or mercury was used as the non-wetting phase while water (or brine, in the case of core samples) was the wetting phase. Constant rate injection was provided by means of a syringe pump, using water to displace a slug of either air or mercury in a tube connected to the porous medium at rates of about 1.8 × 10−2 cm3/min. Pressure was measured at the sample inlet using a pressure transducer and data were recorded using a data acquisition system. The injection pressure vs. time plot reveals the highest pressure established in such a test, which is identified as the breakthrough capillary pressure. It was concluded that the new test enables the determination of the breakthrough capillary pressure in micromodels with excellent accuracy. The new test was also validated using a sandstone core sample. Introduction In the literature of immiscible displacement in porous media, the terms "breakthrough capillary pressure," "threshold pressure," "entry pressure," and "bubbling pressure" are frequently encountered. It has been observed, for example, that in order to make a non-wetting phase, such as air, flow through a porous medium saturated with brine, the applied capillary pressure on the air side has to exceed a critical limiting value, Pc °, at which air can flow through the medium (i.e., can break through and emerge as bubbles from the outlet face of the sample). The pore channels in the medium used by the air to break through the sample are made up of pore sizes greater than or equal to the pore size De °, defined by Equation (Available In Full Paper) Where γ is the interfacial tension, θ is the contact angle, and De ° is the (equivalent) diameter of a capillary tube of circular cross-section which requires the same capillary pressure, Pc °, for penetration as that measured at breakthrough capillary pressure in the porous medium. The value of De ° calculated using Equation (1) is the minimum capillary size that is necessary for the non-wetting phase to invade and break through the medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207