Remodeling of Ca2+-handling by atrial tachycardia: evidence for a role in loss of rate-adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Loss of rate-dependent action potential (AP) duration (APD) adaptation is a characteristic feature of atrial tachycardia-induced remodeling (ATR). ATR causes sarcolemmal ion-channel remodeling (ICR) and changes in Ca(2+)-handling. The present studies were designed to quantify Ca(2+)-handling changes and then to apply a mathematical AP model to assess the contributions of Ca(2+)-handling abnormalities and ICR to loss of APD rate-adaptation. METHODS: Indo-1 fluorescence was used to measure intracellular Ca(2)-transients and whole-cell patch-clamp to record APs in atrial myocytes from control dogs and dogs subjected to atrial pacing at 400/min for 6 weeks. A previously developed ionic model of the canine atrial AP was modified to reproduce measured Ca(2+)-transients of control and ATR myocytes. RESULTS: In control, APD to 95% repolarization (APD(95)) decreased by 91 ms experimentally and by 88 ms in the model over the 1-6 Hz range. In ATR myocytes, APD(95) failed to decrease over the 1-6 Hz range. Ca(2+)-handling abnormalities in ATR myocytes included slowed upstroke, decreased amplitude and strong single-beat post-rest potentiation. Unaltered Ca(2+)-handling properties included caffeine-releasable Ca(2+)-stores and Ca(2+)-transient relaxation before and after exposure to the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase (SERCA) inhibitor cyclopiazonic acid (CPA). Including ICR alone in the model accounted for loss of APD(50) rate-adaptation; however, KR alone reduced APD(95) rate-adaptation by only 19% to 71 ms. When both ICR and Ca(2+)-handling changes were incorporated, APD(95) rate-adaptation decreased to 6 ms, accounting for experimental observations. CONCLUSION: ICR alone does not fully account for loss of APD rate-adaptation with atrial remodeling: Ca(2+)-handling changes appear to contribute to this clinically significant phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".