MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134742766 · doi:10.1117/12.632245

Expanding grayscale capability of direct-write grayscale photomask by using modified Bi/In compositions

2005· article· en· W2134742766 on OpenAlexaff
David K. Poon, Glenn H. Chapman, Chinheng Choo, Jun Wang, Yuqiang Tu, Michelle L. La Haye

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrayscaleMaterials sciencePhotomaskLaserOpticsLaser power scalingOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePixelNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bimetallic thin films have been proven to be effective in creating analog direct write grayscale photomasks. DC-sputtered Bi/In or Sn/In oxidizes under laser writing exposure. The optical density decreases from >3OD as deposited to a transparency of <0.22OD at 365 nm with increasing laser power. The bimetallic film has a response curve that is nearly linear for much of the curve, but non-linear at maximum absorption and transmission. In order to create more accurate gray levels, a more gradual OD change versus laser writing power is desired. In this research a new reactive sputtered, oxygenated Bi/In film was created that has an 8-bits grayscale level sensitivity of 1.1 gray levels/mV, compared with the previous Bi/In of 3.2 gray levels/mV and Sn/In of 2.8 gray levels/mV. This modified Bi/In film provides more than twice the laser writing power range for controlling the same OD range, as compared to our original Bi/In or Sn/In films. This wider power range provides easier and more accurate laser power-to-grayscale calibration, because each grayscale can now be spaced more evenly over the increased laser writing power range. In addition, the surface of modified Bi/In is found to be much smoother than the original Bi/In and Sn/In films, thus increasing the overall quality of grayscale photomask. Finally grayscale uniformity of the laser writing process has been investigated and techniques such as laser beam shaping and defocusing have been used successfully to eliminate the variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207