MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134759021 · doi:10.1086/425007

Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Intravenous Ribavirin for the Treatment of Hantavirus Cardiopulmonary Syndrome in North America

2004· article· en· W2134759021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Vectors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsMedicineRibavirinPlaceboInternal medicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationAnesthesiaImmunologyVirusResuscitationHepatitis C virusPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Ribavirin is active in vitro against hantaviruses, but the findings of an open trial of the use of intravenous ribavirin for the treatment of hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) were inconclusive. METHODS: Subjects with suspected HCPS in the prodrome or cardiopulmonary phase but without shock were eligible for randomization to receive either intravenous ribavirin (33 mg/kg [<or=2 g], followed by 16 mg/kg [<or=1 g] given every 6 h for 4 days and by 8 mg/kg [<or=.5 g] given every 8 h for 3 days) or placebo (administered for 7 days or until the initial Sin Nombre virus antibody test result was confirmed to be negative). The primary outcome was survival at day 28 of the study without the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled in the trial from March 1996 through July 2001, at which point the study was terminated prematurely because of both the slow rate of accrual of subjects and the findings of a futility analysis. Of the 36 subjects enrolled, 23 (all of whom were enrolled during the cardiopulmonary stage of HCPS) had HCPS confirmed by serologic testing. The severity of illness at entry into the study was similar among the 10 subjects with HCPS who received ribavirin and the 13 subjects with HCPS who received placebo. The proportion of subjects who survived and who did not require ECMO was similar among ribavirin recipients and placebo recipients (70% vs. 62%, respectively); 2 ribavirin recipients and 2 placebo recipients died, including 3 of 7 subjects treated with ECMO. The frequency of adverse events, including anemia, was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of accrual of subjects in the present study was inadequate to clearly assess the safety or efficacy of ribavirin in the treatment of HCPS. However, ribavirin was well tolerated, and the lack of trends supporting the use of intravenous ribavirin suggests that it is probably ineffective in the treatment of HCPS in the cardiopulmonary stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it