Structures and energetics of electrosprayed uracil<sub>n</sub>Ca<sup>2+</sup>clusters (n = 14–4) in the gas phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clusters of uracil (U) about a calcium dication, U(n)Ca(2+) (n = 14-4), have been studied in the gas phase by both experimental and theoretical methods. Temperature dependent blackbody infrared radiative dissociation (BIRD) experiments were performed on U(n)Ca(2+) clusters with n = 14-5 and the observed Arrhenius parameters are reported here. Master equation modeling of the BIRD kinetics data was carried out to determine threshold dissociation energies. Initial geometry calculations were performed using the B3LYP density functional and 3-21G(d) basis set. A sample of ten conformations per cluster was obtained through a simulated annealing study. These structures were optimized using B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory. Fragment-based hybrid many body interaction (HMBI) MP2/6-311++G(2df,2p)/Amoeba calculations were performed on representative conformations to determine theoretical binding energies. Results were examined in relation to cluster size (n). A significant increase in the energy required to remove uracil from U(6)Ca(2+) when compared to larger clusters supports previous reports that the calcium ion is coordinated by six uracil molecules in the formation of an inner shell. For clusters larger than n = 6, an odd-even alternation in threshold dissociation energies was observed, suggesting that the outer shell uracil molecules bind as dimers to the inner core. Proposed binding schemes are presented. Multiple structures of U(5)Ca(2+) are suggested as being present in the gas phase where the fifth uracil may be either part of the first or second solvation shell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".