Electrically Conducting PDMS Nanocomposite Using In Situ Reduction of Gold Nanostructures and Mechanical Stimulation of Carbon Nanotubes and Silver Nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrically conducting nanocomposite has numerous application potential in flexible MEMS and wearable electronics. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been identified as an attractive candidate for the fabrication of Bio-MEMS devices due to several benefits such as biocompatibility, good optical properties, easy and low-cost fabrication using soft-lithography, etc. Until now, the synthesis of electrically conducting nanocomposite is proposed only by mechanical stimulation of electrically conducting nano materials such as carbon nanotubes, gold or silver nanoparticles in polymer matrix. In this work, an electrically conducting PDMS nanocomposite is synthesized using a novel combined process of in situ reduction by curing agent of PDMS from aqueous gold chloride solution, and mechanical stimulation of multi-wall carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles. The optical, electrical and thermal properties of the PDMS- nanocomposite are characterized. Further, the nanocomposite is micro patterned to fabricate heating elements and electrical signal routing lines in flexible PDMS sheets. The resistivity of the nanocomposite is measured as 3.5 × 10−3 Ω.m, which is much lower than the previously reported value of 1 Ω.m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it