The Lewis acidity of fluorophosphonium salts: access to mixed valent phosphorus(<scp>iii</scp>)/(<scp>v</scp>) species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidative fluorination of the electron-deficient phosphine Ph(2)P(C(6)F(5)) using XeF(2), followed by fluoride ion abstraction from the resulting difluorophosphorane Ph(2)P(F)(2)(C(6)F(5)), produces electrophilic fluorophosphonium salts [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(5))][X] (X = FB(C(6)F(5))(3) or O(3)SCF(3)). Variable temperature NMR spectroscopic analysis of [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(5))][FB(C(6)F(5))(3)] demonstrates a fluxional process attributed to fluoride ion exchange between B(C(6)F(5))(3) and [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(5))](+), suggesting that these species have comparable Lewis acidities. This exchange can also be illustrated by adding phosphine Ph(3)P to [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(5))][FB(C(6)F(5))(3)] at ambient temperature to produce Ph(2)P(F)(2)(C(6)F(5)) and Ph(3)P-B(C(6)F(5))(3), while heating this mixture results in thermally induced para-substitution of Ph(3)P at the C(6)F(5) group of the phosphonium ion to generate [Ph(3)P(C(6)F(4))P(F)(2)Ph(2)][FB(C(6)F(5))(3)]. Such frustrated Lewis pair reactivity also can be exploited by reacting [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(5))][O(3)SCF(3)] with silylphosphine Ph(2)PSiMe(3) to afford the unique mixed-valent salt [Ph(2)P(C(6)F(4))P(F)Ph(2)][O(3)SCF(3)], which upon the addition of fluoride is converted to Ph(2)P(C(6)F(4))P(F)(2)Ph(2). XeF(2) reacts with [Ph(2)P(C(6)F(4))P(F)Ph(2)][O(3)SCF(3)] at ambient temperature, producing equal proportions of the dicationic salt [Ph(2)P(F)(C(6)F(4))P(F)Ph(2)][O(3)SCF(3)](2) and the bis(difluorophosphorane) Ph(2)P(F)(2)(C(6)F(4))P(F)(2)Ph(2), the latter of which can then be quantitatively converted to the former by adding one equiv of Me(3)SiO(3)SCF(3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".