Comparative activity of new quinolones against 326 clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important emerging pathogen causing a variety of infections in severely ill patients. This microorganism is inherently resistant to many antibiotics, and only a few therapeutic options are available. The principal aim of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of new quinolones against this pathogen. Three hundred and twenty-six single clinical isolates were tested in this study. The MIC(90) was 16 mg/L for ciprofloxacin, 8 mg/L for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, 4 mg/L for trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin and 2 mg/L for clinafloxacin. At a 2 mg/L concentration, a C(max) lung:MIC ratio of >/=10 can be reached for 95%, 84.3%, 83.1% and 81.5% of isolates, respectively, for clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin (P < 0. 001 compared with levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin). In spite of the rare but serious adverse events associated with the new-generation quinolones, these agents may become very useful in the treatment of certain severe or life-threatening infectious conditions due to S. maltophilia, notably lower respiratory tract infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".