Comparative activity of new quinolones against 326 clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important emerging pathogen causing a variety of infections in severely ill patients. This microorganism is inherently resistant to many antibiotics, and only a few therapeutic options are available. The principal aim of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of new quinolones against this pathogen. Three hundred and twenty-six single clinical isolates were tested in this study. The MIC(90) was 16 mg/L for ciprofloxacin, 8 mg/L for levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, 4 mg/L for trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin and 2 mg/L for clinafloxacin. At a 2 mg/L concentration, a C(max) lung:MIC ratio of >/=10 can be reached for 95%, 84.3%, 83.1% and 81.5% of isolates, respectively, for clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin and sparfloxacin (P < 0. 001 compared with levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin). In spite of the rare but serious adverse events associated with the new-generation quinolones, these agents may become very useful in the treatment of certain severe or life-threatening infectious conditions due to S. maltophilia, notably lower respiratory tract infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it