Change in clinician-assessed measures of multiple sclerosis and subject-reported quality of life: results from the IMPACT study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The IMPACT study demonstrated the benefit of interferon beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a, Avonex) two-year change in disability measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SP-MS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI). The IMPACT data permit a detailed assessment of the relation between clinical and self-reported measures. METHODS: IMPACT was an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of SP-MS patients. As the MSQLI is only in English, this report includes US and Canadian subjects. Subjects were randomized to weekly intramuscular (im) injections of INbeta-1a (60 microg) or placebo for 24 months. RESULTS: At baseline and follow-up, MSQLI correlations were generally stronger with the EDSS than with the MSQLI, MSFC but comparable with MSFC components. Combining the two groups, MSQLI changes for those in the best and worst MSFC change quartiles demonstrated a statistical difference for six of the 11 MSQLI scales. Linear regression demonstrated that EDSS change from baseline to month-24 scores was correlated with change in two MSQLI components. CONCLUSION: These data support the appropriateness of using the MSQLI with individuals who have SP-MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".