MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2135081345 · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6920

Technical note: Use of laser capture microdissection for the localization of tissue-specific global gene expression in rumen papillae

2013· article· en· W2135081345 on OpenAlexafffund
M.A. Steele, Ousama AlZahal, S.L. Greenwood, J. C. Matthews, B.W. McBride

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaser capture microdissectionConnective tissueBiologyGene expressionGene expression profilingEpitheliumRNARumenExtracellular matrixMolecular biologyGeneCell biologyPathologyGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gene expression profiling of bovine rumen tissue has provided insight into dietary regulation of rumen epithelial function. However, most studies have relied on a heterogeneous sample with multiple tissue and cell types. The objective of this study was to use laser capture microdissection to characterize RNA expression profiling of epithelial and connective tissues of rumen papillae. Papillae were biopsied from 3 lactating dairy cows, frozen in cryomolds, cut into sections, stained, and dehydrated, and epithelial and connective cells were collected using laser capture microdissection. Total RNA was isolated from epithelial and connective tissue and global gene expression was assessed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Bovine Gene 1.0 ST array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Data preprocessing was conducted using the robust multi-array average method, and detection of differentially expressed genes (DEG) was determined using ANOVA. The model included the fixed effect of tissue, and a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.1 was applied to DEG. We found 382 DEG between epithelial and connective tissues. Analysis of these DEG using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Redwood City, CA) found that epithelial and connective tissues in rumen papillae expressed distinct RNA profiles (signatures). The epithelial signature was enriched with RNA encoding tight junction and metabolic genes, whereas connective signatures were enriched with RNA encoding proteins involved in cell structure and extracellular matrix composition. The molecular functions enriched within the top networks between the 2 tissues from the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis included connective tissue disorders, dermatological diseases and conditions, gastrointestinal disease, tissue morphology, and tissue development. In summary, it is possible to use laser capture microdissection for the localization of tissue-specific global gene expression in rumen papillae. This approach may be useful to improve the accuracy and interpretation of molecular measurements in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy Science→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→