MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135085762 · doi:10.1017/s0965539504001391

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN HIGH RISK SITUATIONS IN PREGNANCY

2005· article· en· W2135085762 on OpenAlexaff
Anne McLeod, Cameron A.J. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal and Maternal Medicine Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyPulmonary embolismDeep veinThrombophiliaThrombosisCaesarean sectionVenous thromboembolismObstetricsGestationRisk factorDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the western developed world. VTE may present as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) but if untreated can result in fatal PE. Although fatal PE is clearly the most significant consequence of VTE in pregnancy, DVT also often leads to morbidity related to the development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Pregnancy is an independent risk factor for VTE and the risk of VTE is 4–10 fold higher in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women of similar age. The puerperium represents a time of even higher risk. It is clear that many additional high-risk situations in pregnancy lower the threshold for thrombosis and warrant measures to prevent VTE and its complications. Risk factors for pregnancy-related VTE may be inherited or acquired. Acquired risk factors may be specifically related to the pregnancy or may have developed prior to pregnancy. Well-documented risk factors for pregnancy-related VTE include delivery by Caesarean section, previous VTE, and inherited or acquired thrombophilia. Other risk factors that have been identified include obesity, multiparity, multiple gestation, pre-eclampsia and medical conditions, such as sickle cell disease, that predispose to VTE. Our ability to diagnose VTE overall is poor as presenting signs and symptoms are extremely varied and unreliable. This is further complicated in pregnancy where signs and symptoms suggestive of VTE are common and invasive testing is more complicated. It is essential that physicians be vigilant in monitoring patients for the development of VTE and maintain a low threshold for considering thromboprophylaxis. Guidelines have recently been published by several medical societies to help with these difficult decisions. In this review the risk factors for the development of VTE in pregnancy will be discussed and guidelines for risk assessment presented. Management of patients who develop VTE in pregnancy is also outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal and Maternal Medicine ReviewSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207