Kajian Teknologi Sand by Passing Penanggulangan Sedimentasi dan Erosi Pantai Bengkulu (Pelabuhan Pulau Baai)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Curently the port flow conditions Baai Island can no longer be passed if the large size of the ships that will stop at the port. This is because the rut depth at this point is just -2m until -4m LWS, from a normal condition that should be -10m until -12m LWS.This situation is certainly very disturbing process of exit and entry of goods and service to the province of Bengkulu throught this port, and negatively impact the local economy.The aim of this thinking is to provide input for the achievement of an optimal solution to overcome sedimentation arround Baai island port Bengkulu to know the behaviourof the sedimentation ponds arround the harbour entrance and the effect on navigation channel.The scope of research is supporting data collection relating to the port Baai Island Bengkulu including development planning reports, Baai harbour and reports on the sedimentation and the condition of the harbour. The method of analysis used in this study were laboratory analysis techniques. Analysis of what has been studied to mentionthat the large amount of sedimen transport (litoral transport) along the coast of the port based on wave direction,among others from the west and south-west and north, are as follows: 1) total sediment transport (Qs) which took place on the beach ports Baai island is: 601,576.20m3/year. 2)The sediment transport that provides the greatest contribution to the sedimentation flow Baai harbour island is the result of calculation is from the west (toward the most dominant),namely: Qs-net = 573,916.72 m3/year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it