A METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS EXTRACTION OF MULTISPECTRALLY CLASSIFIED URBAN RIVERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The continuous extraction of linear objects, such as rivers, roads, or boundaries, from digital images can hardly be achieved using automatic methods. Line extraction algorithms as well as multispectral classification usually break down linear objects into segments with significant noise. In urban areas it is especially hard to continuously extract small rivers because of mixed pixels and other disturbing elements (bridges, ships, shadows, etc.). Therefore, methods for connecting broken linear segments and eliminating noise are important. For mapping urban water areas, in addition to connecting broken river segments, additional operations have to be carried out. In this study, a simple and effective automatic method was developed to connect river segments and eliminate noise. By applying this method, discontinuous river segments can be connected, small water areas can be separated from noise, and noise in large water areas can be eliminated. The method was tested using Landsat m/l images in the urban area of Shanghai, China. The visible water bodies in the TM image were extracted. The result shows that the accuracy of urban water area extraction is increased up to over 95 percent. Rivers and canals broader than one image pixel can be completely
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".