Solvent-Dependent Access to Two Different Ni4II Core Topologies from the First Use of Pyridine-2,6-dimethanol in Nickel(ii) Cluster Chemistry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of pyridine-2,6-dimethanol, pdmH2, in reactions with nickel(ii) acetate has led to two Ni4 clusters, depending on the solvent. [Ni4(O2CMe)4(pdmH)4]·MeCN (1·MeCN) can be obtained from MeCN and [Ni4(O2CMe)6(pdmH)2(EtOH)2]·1.2EtOH (2·1.2EtOH) from EtOH. Each cluster can be converted into the other in the appropriate solvent. The tetranuclear cluster molecule 1 possesses a distorted cubane {Ni4(μ3-OR)4}4+ core (RO– = pdmH–) with the NiII atoms and the alkoxide-type oxygen atoms from the η3 : η1 : μ3 pdmH– ligands occupying alternate vertices of the cube; four η1 : η1 : μ MeCO2– groups cap four faces of the cube. The four NiII atoms in molecule 2 are located at four vertices of a defective dicubane and are bridged by six oxygen atoms, two μ3 from the η3 : η1 : η1 : μ3 pdmH– ligands and four from four monoatomically bridging MeCO2– groups; peripheral ligation is provided by two η1 : η1 : μ MeCO2– groups and two terminal EtOH ligands. IR data are discussed in terms of the coordination modes of the ligands. Variable-temperature direct-current magnetic susceptibility data of 1 and 2 were modelled with two and three J values respectively, indicating diamagnetic ground states (S = 0). The sign and the magnitude of the J values are discussed in terms of structural features of the complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it