The Applicability of Statistical Process Control to Systems Involving People Processes and Business Rhythms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The operation and maintenance (O&M) activities of systems can account for 75% of total lifecycle cost. To effectively manage cost, optimize system “on” time, and mitigate defects/failures during the O&M phase of a system's lifecycle, the application of systems monitoring and control is encouraged. Statistical process control ( SPC ) in general, the control chart specifically, is the most common monitoring approach. The control chart provides alerts with respect to the behavior of systems and processes, as well as changes in process variability. Data applied to control charts is assumed to adhere to a normal distribution, a constraint often satisfied in manufacturing and similar industries where the natural variation in the process or system follows the Gaussian distribution. Systems involving people processes and business rhythms can compromise the normality assumption, reducing the reliability of SPC . Through the application of SPC , this paper proposes a novel approach to monitoring operational systems in the systems engineering O&M phase for the express purpose of reducing high costs by mitigating system discrepancies and uncovering inefficiencies. This paper focuses on processes that require 100% system data sampling due to the operational nature of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".