Do zeolite precursor species really exist in aqueous synthesis media?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors of a recent report in this journal (Houssin, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 3518, ) claim that a tetrapropylammonium (TPA) silicate mixture with molar composition 4.41 TPAOH : 10 SiO(2) : 117 H(2)O contains high concentrations of two silicate oligomers, the prismatic double five-ring and a novel pentacyclic dodecamer. The latter species is derivative of the framework structure of silicalite-1, a MFI-type zeolite that spontaneously crystallizes from this system, and, indeed, the authors declare it to be a "nanoprecursor" in the TPA-mediated growth of silicalite-1. Using two-dimensional (29)Si COSY NMR spectroscopy to examine an equivalent mixture enriched in the (29)Si isotope, we show that the published peak assignments are erroneous. The signal assigned to the double five-ring corresponds, in reality, to the well-characterized pentacyclic octamer, while the three signals assigned to the pentacyclic dodecamer arise from three completely separate species. We find no evidence, therefore, to support the suggestion that silicalite-1 is formed by sequential condensation of precursor species any more complex than the simple orthosilicate anion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".