What Really Made MAO Change his Ideas on the Principal Social Contradiction in 1957
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Evidences indicate that, in the period from the 8th Party Congress to its third plenary session, MAO gave his approvals to the basic conclusion on China’s principal social contradiction, but not to the redundant words in it. We could not take MAO’s criticism to the redundant words as his denial to the basic conclusion, and the more, we should not take it as a proof that MAO changed his viewpoint on the principal social contradiction of China afterwards. In 1956, the twentieth congress of the Communist Party of the USSR aroused much unexpected turmoil both inside and outside China. Especially when CCP began to rectify its working style in the spring of 1957, some intellectuals advanced their advices and political propositions among which there were some inclination and insinuation to challenge the reigning of CCP. All these made MAO Zedong pay much more attention to the class struggle, and unfortunately MAO made an incorrect judgment. The assaults from the rightists and the magnification of anti-rightists are the key causes for MAO to change his idea on the principal social contradiction. Key words: Mao; Denial; Principal Contradiction; Causes Resume Les evidences indiquent que, dans la periode allant de la 8e Partie du congres a sa troisieme seance pleniere, MAO a donne ses approbations a la conclusion sur la base de la Chine contradiction sociale principale, mais ne pas les mots redondants en elle. Nous ne pouvions pas prendre la critique de MAO aux mots redondants que son refus a la conclusion de base, et plus, nous ne devrions pas le prendre comme une preuve que MAO a change son point de vue sur la contradiction principale social de la Chine par la suite. En 1956, le vingtieme congres du Parti communiste de l’URSS a suscite beaucoup d’agitation inattendue tant a l’interieur et a l’exterieur de la Chine. Surtout quand PCC a commence a remedier a son style de travail au printemps de 1957, certains intellectuels avance leurs conseils et leurs propositions politiques parmi lesquels il y avait une certaine inclinaison et l’insinuation de contester le champion de la CCP. Tous ces faits MAO Zedong payer beaucoup plus d’attention a la lutte des classes, et, malheureusement, MAO a pris une decision erronee. Les attaques des droitiers et l’agrandissement de l’anti-droitiers sont les principales causes de MAO pour changer son idee sur la contradiction principale sociale. Mots cles: Mao; Le refus; Contradiction principale; Causes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".