Loss of SNF5 Expression Correlates with Poor Patient Survival in Melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Aberrant expression of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is involved in cancer development. The tumor suppressor SNF5, the core subunit of SWI/SNF complex, has been shown to regulate cell differentiation, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. To investigate the role of SNF5 in the development of melanoma, we examined the expression of SNF5 in melanocytic lesions at different stages and analyzed the correlation between SNF5 expression and clinicopathologic variables and patient survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry, we evaluated SNF5 staining in 51 dysplastic nevi, 88 primary melanomas, and 48 metastatic melanomas. We studied chemosensitivity of melanoma cells with reduced SNF5 expression by siRNA using cell survival and apoptosis assays. RESULTS: SNF5 expression was reduced in metastatic melanoma compared with dysplastic nevi (P = 0.005), in advanced primary melanoma (Clark's level V) compared with low risk Clark's level II melanoma (P = 0.019), and in melanoma at sun-exposed sites compared with sun-protected sites (P = 0.044). Furthermore, we showed a strong correlation between negative SNF5 expression and a worse 5-year survival in melanoma patients (P = 0.016). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that negative SNF5 expression is an independent prognostic factor to predict patient outcome in primary melanomas (P = 0.031). Finally, we showed that knockdown of SNF5 in melanoma cell lines resulted in significant chemoresistance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that SNF5 may be an important marker for human melanoma progression and prognosis as well as a potential therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".